Zero Click Marketing Does Not Mean Zero Sales
It means tracking influence is getting harder and harder. New pod episode just dropped.
One of the most common objections I hear about Zero Click Marketing goes something like this:
“But if people aren’t clicking… how do they buy?”
Fair question. For the last 15-20 years, digital marketing has trained us to believe that the click is the signal that something worked. No click meant no progress in the funnel.
But the click was never the thing doing the persuading. The persuading happened before the click.
On the newest episode of the Zero Click Marketing podcast, Rand Fishkin said something that I think explains this perfectly:
“Zero Click Marketing does not mean zero sales. All the things that happen in a zero-click environment will eventually lead to the same outcome clicks led to — someone who wants to buy shoes will buy shoes. The question is: will they buy yours?”
More and more of the influence shaping those decisions happens inside platforms, inside conversations, and inside AI answers, the vast majority of which you can’t track.
Someone reads your LinkedIn posts for months. They see your brand recommended in a ChatGPT answer. A colleague mentions your product. Eventually they’re ready to buy. They Google your brand name and click on your website; if you’re unlucky, they’ll click on your ad because it shows up before the organic result. (YaAaAay, at least we were ROAS positive this month?)
And then your analytics dashboard will show direct traffic.
The measurement problem
This is where Zero Click Marketing makes people uncomfortable. Executives often ask the same question:
“How do we prove that this worked?”
My honest answer is… sometimes you can’t prove it the way digital marketing trained us to expect. You can, however, observe patterns. One easy way we do this at SparkToro is, anytime we see a bump in traffic or conversions, we look at our own calendars to see what events took place. Oh yeah, my colleague Rand keynoted at that conference. Or, that was the day my LinkedIn post got high engagement.
These days, AI is making this shift even more obvious. When someone asks ChatGPT or Claude for recommendations, they often get an answer without ever visiting the sources. Brands benefit from being mentioned, and we know it (isn’t that why your boss is bugging you about showing up in ChatGPT?) even if we can’t reliably see it. That’s the newest zero-click reality we’re living in.
In this episode, Rand and I also talk about why AI rank tracking is mostly nonsense — but why AI visibility (how often your brand appears in answers) may be a much more meaningful signal. In fact, Rand and Gumshoe.ai did the research to back this up, and we dive into all of that. This one’s for my fellow “well actually” nerds.
Watch the full episode: Tell Your Execs AI Rankings Are BS (with Rand Fishkin)
We get into:
executive buy-in for Zero Click Marketing
why attribution is harder than marketers want to admit
leading vs. lagging indicators
why AI rankings are unreliable
what actually signals influence today
If you like the ZCM pod, pretty please leave a positive review. You won’t get anything in return except the warm fuzzy feeling that you made an indie creator’s day. (I write, research, and produce each episode myself, though this week I had a solid assist from my friends at ShareYourGenius.com.)
And if you wanna learn more about the Zero Click Marketing lore, hire me, or sponsor the show, check out my shiny new website: zeroclickmarketing.co.
Don’t worry; I’m still sending this newsletter only when I truly have something to say, which is probably like, 4-5 times per month. Forward it to a friend?